I wonder if they realized, while they were making "Winter People," how similar it was to "Witness" - and how inferior. Both movies star Kelly McGillis, which might have provided the inspiration for a closer look at the recycled similarities, but apparently did not. The plot is like "Witness" turned inside out and played as a "Li'l Abner" parody.
"Winter People" is based on a novel by John Ehle, but it's almost as if the novel was chosen because it provided an outline for a movie that would try to duplicate the unique success of "Witness." Consider: "Winter People" stars McGillis as a woman who lives by herself in an isolated community of mountain people. It's early in the 1930s. She has a young son. She is an outsider, because the father of the child has not been publicly acknowledged; actually, it's a young man from the clan that's feuding with her family. Out of the hills one day comes a peaceful clockmaker (Kurt Russell), a widower with a young daughter. He's marooned, winter is coming on and he accepts an offer to stay for a while in McGillis' cabin. Soon they fall in love, but then Russell must defend her and her son against the drunken father of her child.
In "Witness," McGillis was an Amish widow with a young son, living in an isolated, self-contained community. On a trip to the city, the son witnessed a murder. Harrison Ford was the police detective who later saved them from a violent attack, was nursed back to health by the woman and lived for a time on her farm. The Amish people - especially her father - did not much like the city slicker's ways. They fell in love, and then Ford had to defend her and her son against the killers who had tracked them down.
The dynamics of the two stories are remarkably similar: isolated single mother, self-contained community, heroic outsider, love, hostility from the community, defense of the new family unit against a violent predator male. The principal difference is that the Amish community is pacifist, and fears the violent outsider; the mountain men are violent, and fear the pacifist outsider. But why do I undertake this exercise in comparison? To try to figure out why "Winter People" is so spineless as a movie. The film is long, dreary and boring, and has the same relationship to "Witness" that a negative number has to a positive number: The shape and form are the same, but there doesn't seem to be anything there. One of the missing elements is any chemistry between McGillis and Russell, who play their love scenes with a certain studied coolness.