… for confirming a few details in Entertainment Weekly: about CGI techniques (and your intentions) that I noticed when I saw “Avatar.” James Cameron, I see you:
“[Bob Zemeckis (“Polar Express,” “Disney’s A Christmas Carol”] essentially is making animated films using an actor-driven process. His visual choice on ‘Beowulf’ didn’t require photo-realism. ‘Avatar’ is a different kettle of fish. We were intercutting live-action footage with CG footage, so our CG had to be interchangeable with photography.”
* * * *
There’s a rumor going around that some of the humans in “Avatar” are CGI creations. Any truth to that?
”There are a number of shots of CGI humans,” James Cameron says. ”The shots of [Stephen Lang] in an AMP suit, for instance — those are completely CG. But there’s a threshold of proximity to the camera that we didn’t feel comfortable going beyond. We didn’t get too close.”
* * * *
What’s the difference between normal 3-D and RealD 3-D? And is it better to see it in one format over another?
”The differences with the types of 3-D are just the mechanics of how it gets up on the screen,” producer Jon Landau explains. ”There’s really not much difference visually, except in the type of eyeglasses you’re wearing.”
