In Memoriam 1942 – 2013 “Roger Ebert loved movies.”

RogerEbert.com

Thumb_office_christmas_party

Office Christmas Party

Another reminder that allowing your cast to madly improvise instead of actually providing a coherent script with a scintilla of inherent logic often leads to…

Other Reviews
Review Archives
Thumb_xbepftvyieurxopaxyzgtgtkwgw

Ballad of Narayama

"The Ballad of Narayama" is a Japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. What a space it opens…

Other Reviews
Great Movie Archives
Primary_y4d3-dsc_0327_2963903c

If We Picked the Winners 2015: Best Director

In anticipation of the Academy Awards, we polled our contributors to see who they thought should win the Oscar. Once we had our winners, we asked various writers to make the case for our selection in each category. Here, Susan Wloszczyna makes the case for the Best Director of 2014: Richard Linklater for "Boyhood". 


“Boyhood” is Richard Linklater’s Sistine Chapel, his “Mona Lisa,” his “Starry Night.” It is the movie he has been building towards since he captured a day in the laid-back life of the denizens of Austin, Texas, in 1991’s “Slacker.” Since that time, the Lone Star native, 54, has slowly yet surely built up the artistic reserves he needed to turn a 12-year filmmaking journey into a Rorschach test for a society that has grown used to charting their own personal milestones on such forums as Facebook and Instagram.

“Boyhood” manages to be ambitious yet humble, singular yet recognizable. The coming-of-age tale, brought to life by actors who were filmed over a dozen years, follows the trajectory of a young lad in suburban Texas (Ellar Coltrane) as he transitions from curious kindergartener to aimless pubescent to fairly level-headed college student. That Linklater earned the trust of his core cast (including his own daughter, Lorelei) to make such a leap-of-faith commitment is award-worthy in itself.

As the rare filmmaker whose resume is equal parts mainstream and experimental, Linklater has been prepping for this project for a while in the guise of becoming a cinematic anthropologist. You can see touches of “Boyhood” in his previous efforts, such as the “Before Sunset” trilogy (1993-2013), which follows the ups and downs of a couple’s relationship over a decade with the same two actors; in the stylized philosophical discussions found in the animated “Waking Life” (2001); and even in the raucous insights provided by the musical whiz kids in “School of Rock” (2005).

As a result, Linklater has arguably become one of America’s premier observers of commonplace humanity. In his hands, the seemingly unremarkable often becomes special. That is especially true of “Boyhood” as it encourages audiences to open up their own memory bank of events that have defined us as children and adults.

It might be tempting to see “Boyhood” simply as a stunt, a series of 21st-century Kodak moments generic enough that almost anyone can relate. But that ignores the distinctive emotional shadings provided by the actors, especially Patricia Arquette as a caring mother cursed with rotten taste in spouses and Ethan Hawke as her feckless first husband as their characters both evolve as much as their son and daughter. In the end, Linklater and his dedicated cast and crew have succeeded in capturing our daily routines and preserving them in a remarkably moving time capsule.  

Popular Blog Posts

The Unloved, Part 36: "Lisztomania"

For the 36th installment in his video essay series about maligned masterworks, Scout Tafoya examines Ken Russell's "L...

Why Critics Should See Bad Movies

A piece on the experience gained from seeing bad movies.

Who do you read? Good Roger, or Bad Roger?

This message came to me from a reader named Peter Svensland. He and a fr...

Racism, Religion and Remembering Pearl Harbor

Remember Pearl Harbor and remember how prejudice shaped history.

Reveal Comments
comments powered by Disqus