In Memoriam 1942 – 2013 “Roger Ebert loved movies.”

RogerEbert.com

Thumb wildlife

Wildlife

One never senses judgment from Dano, Kazan, Gyllenhaal, or Mulligan—they recognize that there’s beauty even in the mistakes we make in life. It’s what makes…

Thumb halloween poster

Halloween

Do you know the biggest sin of the new Halloween? It’s just not scary. And that’s one thing you could never say about the original.

Other Reviews
Review Archives
Thumb xbepftvyieurxopaxyzgtgtkwgw

Ballad of Narayama

"The Ballad of Narayama" is a Japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. What a space it opens…

Other Reviews
Great Movie Archives

Gay-baiting Cruise for cheap laughs?

From: Alan Wootson

You had an interesting piece on the "South Park"-Tom Cruise controversy but I think you missed an important aspect of the 'controversal' episode, and "South Park" in general. I've seen the episode in question, and as the title suggests, a big part of the story involves different characters repeating over and over that Tom Cruise needs to "come out of the closet.' The Cruise character on the show literally locks himself in a closet but this is clearly just an opportunity for the "South Park" creators to gay-bash (or gay-bait) Cruise, and yet again attempt to get cheap laughs with homophobic humor.

Advertisement

Perhaps it was being labelled as gay in this manor that Cruise objected to even more than any attacks on Scientology.

Was he right if he did indeed put pressure on Paramount to pull the episode? I wouldn't say that, but think it's understandable. Why should he cooperate with a corporation that's insulting him, anymore than he has to?

For the record I'm not a Scientologist, I'm not gay and I'm not really much of a Cruise fan (though I thought he was good in "Rain Man" and "War of the Worlds"). Whenever Cruise/Homles celeb hype comes on TV I change the channel and I'm going to skip "Mission Impossible: 3" the way I skipped the first two.

I watched "South Park" when it first came on for a season or two, before it occured to me that the creators really play the 'both sides againt the middle' game in their satire. It makes sense for ratings. You can make some statements against racism or intollerance based on religion or sexual orientation, but also work in the gay jokes and Jewish jokes and sexist jokes to hold onto the 'red state' portion of your audience.

In the end, of course all that really means is that while you appear to be speaking out on important issues, you really aren't saying and don't stand for anything.

Popular Blog Posts

Who do you read? Good Roger, or Bad Roger?

This message came to me from a reader named Peter Svensland. He and a fr...

Netflix’s Terrifying, Moving The Haunting of Hill House is Essential Viewing

A review of Mike Flanagan's new horror series based on the Shirley Jackson novel, The Haunting of Hill House.

"It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World" Gets the Deluxe Treatment from Criterion

An epic essay on an epic comedy of the 1960s, now given deluxe treatment on Blu-ray and DVD by Criterion.

Once Upon a Time in Haddonfield: Revisiting John Carpenter's Halloween

Far Flung Correspondent Seongyong Cho revisits John Carpenter's classic Halloween.

Reveal Comments
comments powered by Disqus