“Plan 9 from Outer Space,” by the Worst Director of All Time

The Ebert Club would like to share the following Public domain film while inviting non-members to join the Club and see what the future holds…”It takes a special weird genius to be voted the Worst Director of All Time, a title that Wood has earned by acclamation. He was so in love with every frame of every scene of every film he shot that he was blind to hilarious blunders, stumbling ineptitude, and acting so bad that it achieved a kind of grandeur.” – Roger, from his review of Ed Wood (1994)  “Greetings, my friend. We are all interested in the future, for that is where you and I are going to spend the rest of our lives. And remember my friend, future events such as these will affect you in the future. You are interested in the unknown… the mysterious. The unexplainable. That is why you are here. And now, for the first time, we are bringing to you, the full story of what happened on that fateful day. We are bringing you all the evidence, based only on the secret testimony, of the miserable souls, who survived this terrifying ordeal. The incidents, the places. My friend, we cannot keep this a secret any longer. Let us punish the guilty. Let us reward the innocent. My friend, can your heart stand the shocking facts of grave robbers from outer space?” – Plan 9 From Outer Space

Yet even more excitement awaits you inside the Newsletter. Join the Club and find out!

April 9, 2013

Werner & Erroll & the mystery of Ed Gein’s grave

Werner Herzog and Errol Morris from Matthew E Ashland on Vimeo.

Photo at top is from Ebertfest 2003.
var a2a_config = a2a_config || {};
a2a_config.linkname = “Roger Ebert’s Journal”;
a2a_config.linkurl = “http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/”;
a2a_config.num_services = 8;

April 9, 2013

A personal letter from Steve Martin

Internet Scout: Larry J. Kolb
var a2a_config = a2a_config || {};
a2a_config.linkname = “Roger Ebert’s Journal”;
a2a_config.linkurl = “http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/”;
a2a_config.num_services = 8;

April 9, 2013

Do I dare to eat a peach?

This would have made the cover of the Weekly World News.

My theory: He saw this movie when he was younger and it traumatized him.

Some 200 of my TwitterPages are linked at the right.
var a2a_config = a2a_config || {};
a2a_config.linkname = “Roger Ebert’s Journal”;
a2a_config.linkurl = “http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/”;
a2a_config.num_services = 8;

April 9, 2013

Three unauthorized out-takes from “Siskel & Ebert” in the 1980s. Bootlegged.

I’ve seen these scattered here and there. Now someone has strung them all together. This was the weekly routine during tapings: Arguments alternating with hilarity, with the offstage voices of Buzz the floor director and Don the director unsuccessfully trying to steer us back on track.

I wrote a blog entry about the energy Siskel and I put into attacking each other. Here it is: Siskel & Ebert at the Jugular.

Thanks for the link to Damon Berger.

April 9, 2013

I’ll never smoke weed with Willie again

My 1986 interview with Willie, happiness is being on the road again.

Some 200 of my TwitterPages are linked at the right.
var a2a_config = a2a_config || {};
a2a_config.linkname = “Roger Ebert’s Journal”;
a2a_config.linkurl = “http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/”;
a2a_config.num_services = 8;

April 9, 2013

Nick & Nora’s hangover cure

Kartina Richardson is a Far-Flung Correspondent for RogerEbert.com. She blogs at Mirror.org and tweets at @thismoithismoi. She treasures her tattoo of Jean Cocteau.

var a2a_config = a2a_config || {};
a2a_config.linkname = “Roger Ebert’s Journal”;
a2a_config.linkurl = “http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/”;
a2a_config.num_services = 8;

Amazon.com Widgets

April 9, 2013

We are part of all worlds

By Mark Hughes on October 20, 2010 6:40 PM

A singularity, tiny beyond comprehension, burst forth with power and energy. In seconds, the foundation for reality and existence in our universe were created. Only Hydrogen and Helium existed as elements. They formed stars.

Eventually, those stars died. Some collapsed and became black holes, singularities working in the reverse of the one that raptured outward to form our universe, instead gobbling up all reality around them. Other stars broke down and exploded, hurtling their essence further into the universe that still grew and expanded and changed around them.

That essence, that dust from the stars, contained new elements, elements formed within the heart of the stars. This star dust, these new elements, formed everything else in the universe. Planets formed, rocks formed, water formed.

And life formed. Life composed of elements born in the heart of the first stars, stars themselves formed from the birth of our universe.

Life no doubt formed all around our universe, including probably on a planet in the Gliese 581 star system. And of course, life formed right here on Earth. Microbes, multi-celled organisms, complex organisms, in the oceans and then crawling out onto land and evolving into all manner of living creatures. On a planet changing radically over millions of years, struck by massive impacts from asteroids and comets, one so large it knocked part of the planet loose and formed our moon.

Life here evolved and became self-aware, stood on hind legs, grunted and then spoke. Looked up into the sky at night, saw the stars, and wondered about our own origins.

We were born out there among the stars, starting in that first instant when the singularity expanded and birthed stars that birthed everything else that became life that looked up into the sky and that finally understood. From a single point to a universe, from stars to stardust to life. From simple life to complex self-awareness.

And meanwhile, still out there, those stars that fell into themselves and formed black holes? They feed on this universe’s leftovers, filling up one side of a singularity that many researches now strongly suspect opens up and spits back out that energy and mass into brand new universes just like our own. The laws pass from one to another, the first stars form again and then in their hearts form the ingredients for the rest of the universe, and once more forming life that will some day look up and understand it all.

Our singularity was probably born that same way, the back door so to speak of a singularity in some universe that already existed long before our own was formed. Our universe was fed by that older universe, the laws passing through to us.

Universes form, inherently forming stars that inherently form the rest of what is needed for a universe, and those stars explode sometimes and collapse other times. And some of the collapsed ones form new singularities birthing more universes, birthing more stars to birth more universes, on and on. Each time, too, some stars birth life. Life that eventually must become self-aware and must eventually comprehend these basic concepts — the simple law of averages says life will exist, and some of that life will understand.

Life is sort of the consciousness of the universe, the way a universe can be aware of its own nature, it’s own past, and you might even say it’s own “purpose” — to reproduce, to make more, to keep understanding.

Think about the odds, the complexity, the beauty and perfection in this. A singularity, a universe, stars, stardust, life, a black hole, a new singularity, a new universe, new stars, new stardust, new life, forever and ever. And we sit here able to understand it, to tell others about it, to look up into the night sky at the stars and know “That’s where we came from, that’s where we’ll go some day, and there are other living things looking up into their own night sky out there around those stars right now thinking the same thing.”

We don’t have to look up and feel insignificant — we are more significant than we can ever probably truly appreciate, as the consciousness of all that exists. We are part of it, part of not only this world but all worlds.

Now tell me — what miracle could be more awe-inspiring than that?

Knowing and believing these things, the idea of a God having made everything would actually be a let-down, wouldn’t it?

This comment was posted on my blog entry here.

April 9, 2013

Samuel Taylor Coleridge

Samuel Taylor Coleridge: 21 October 1772 – 25 July 1834
Tom O’Bedlam reminds me that it was Coleridge who coined the phrase “the willing suspension of disbelief.”
What follows is a 1977 experimental film by Larry Jordan, using animated engravings of Gustave Dore with Orson Welles reading the Coleridge poem. Then there is Tom O’Bedlam reading “Kubla Khan,” and a charming video for an English class about the life of Coleridge. I end with a tribute to Welles. He and Coleridge would have enjoyed one another.

var a2a_config = a2a_config || {};
a2a_config.linkname = “Roger Ebert’s Journal”;
a2a_config.linkurl = “http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/”;
a2a_config.num_services = 8;

April 9, 2013

Richard Harris: Don’t let it be forgot

By Roger Ebert / June 26, 1974

Richard Harris, dressed from head to toe in black, sprawled on the couch in his hotel suite and sang, not at all badly, a few warmup lines of “Oh, What a Beautiful Morning.” It was afternoon, although apparently not for him, and he was in Chicago with Ann Turkel, his bride of 13 days, to promote a new movie they costar in.

The name of the movie is “99 44/100% Dead,” and that is what most of its villains are, after they encounter Harris. Unlike the soap, however, they do not float, and the movie opens and closes with scenes of a macabre fraternity of the deceased: gangland victims encased in concrete and sent to wait at the bottom of the East River.

“The only way to view this movie,” Harris explained, “is to see it as sort of a comic strip, to be enjoyed and laughed at on a strictly one-dimensional level. Once you ask yourself the first question about it, you’re lost.”

Harris plays the world’s greatest hit man, who is imported to New York as a big gun in a war between Little Eddie and Fast Joey, or Little Joey and Fast Eddie (“We never quite explain who either one of them is”), and Ann Turkel plays his girl friend. She is a schoolteacher, who drives the getaway school bus.

“I was petrified,” she said, looking, however, definitively the opposite on the couch next to Harris. “I had never driven a stick shift in my life before, and they gave me about two hours’ lessons and set me loose in Los Angeles traffic.”

“You almost killed the camera crew, luv,” said Harris.

“I almost turned us over,” she said. “They had a stunt man in the back, but I can’t figure out how he was going to help me.”

“He was scared shitless,” Harris observed.

Their movie, which has been directed as sort of a cross between Steve Canyon and Fearless Fosdick, is a very flatsurfaced, exaggerated, popart fantasy by John Frankenheimer, whose other credits include “The Manchurian Candidate.”

“When he sent me the script,” Harris recalled, “I got to the line that said, ‘This town isn’t big enough for both of us,’ and I threw it aside. What the hell kind of line is that? It went out with the 1930s. But then I thought if the script’s so bad, what’s a class director like Frankenheimer doing sending it to me? So I picked it up again, and got the joke. It’s a comic strip put-on, done perfectly seriously.”

It is the latest of a great many movies, most of them (“This Sporting Life,” “Man in the Wilderness,” “Camelot”) successful for Harris, but it’s Ann Turkel’s first role. She’s a Westchester County girl, daughter of a clothing manufacturer, who did a lot of modeling and television commercials before Frankenheimer saw her screen test, liked it and put her opposite Harris. Casting about for the most original question I could imagine, I asked if it had been love at first sight.

“Not exactly,” said Ann, a tall and slender brunet with wide eyes and, sigh, lots of other qualities. “Actually, first sight was five years ago. We met then, but Richard doesn’t even remember.”

“I had my head up my . . . in the clouds,” Harris explained.

“When he found out that I’d been cast for the movie, he wanted me fired,” she said.

“There are too bloody many good actresses unemployed already, so why give this unknown a job, was my line,” Harris said.

“There was an item in one of the London papers, all about Ann Turkel vs. the Ogre,” Ann said.

“I looked up ogre in the dictionary and I didn’t like it one bit,” Harris said.

“We were both in London at the time and scheduled to fly to Los Angeles on the same flight,” she said. “I was so frightened of Richard I changed my ticket to tourist class to escape him.”

“That was unnecessary,” Harris said, because I bloody well didn’t fly back at all. Then Frankenheimer called me up and told me to stop being a bloody fool and trust his judgment, because he’d seen the screen test.

“By the time I finally walked on the set, I was feeling rather guilty, and so I sort of helped her, you know, and we became friends. But she still had her boy friend back in London. One day, after about six months, we were sitting by the pool, and I said, ‘Ann, dearest, do you think there’s something going on between us and we don’t know about it?'”

“Maybe it’s a case of opposites attracting,” Ann said.

“That’s it,” said Harris. “She used to go out with tall, sleek, wellgroomed men, and I went out with buxom blonds. There are thousands of girls on the streets like the ones in Hollywood today, but not many girls of the more elegant type, refined . . . I think Annie has a real gift.”

Their next movie together might be a sequel to his very successful “Man in the Wilderness,” he said. That one grossed around $15 million and was about a civilized English man surviving in the wild.

“I almost got killed on that one,” he recalled. “I was suspended from the top of the tepee for the manhood ceremony, and the rope broke and I fell. I could have landed in the fire or impaled myself on a buffalo horn, but I missed and landed between them. Remembering my early training in tavern brawls, I sprung quickly to my feet, because when you’re on the floor, they kick you. Only THEN did I pass out.”

Harris, it’s been noted, is very likely the only living actor who has starred not only in a Doris Day picture (“Caprice”) but also in a Michelangelo Antonioni picture (“Red Desert”). I asked if he brings the same acting techniques to both kinds of movies.

“The only advice I ever got on acting that did me any good,” he said, “was a long time ago when I was just starting out and I made a picture in Ireland with James Cagney. It was called ‘Shake Hands with the Devil.’ I’ll never forget, one day, Cagney summoned me to his suite at the Shelbourne Hotel for a couple of drinks.

“And then be said, ‘Kid, you’ll do OK. You’ll make it.’ Harris was doing his Cagney imitation. ‘But remember this: When you’re in a movie and they want you to go from one place to another, walk in a straight line. A straight line. That’s how they’ll know you’re the star. Too many of these goddamned English actors are walking in curves all the time!”

Richard Harris at the Toronto Film Festival, 2001.
(Photo by Ebert. Mentioned in obituary below.)

In Memory: Richard Harris.

var a2a_config = a2a_config || {};
a2a_config.linkname = “Roger Ebert’s Journal”;
a2a_config.linkurl = “http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/”;
a2a_config.num_services = 8;

April 9, 2013

Herzog looks ahead to the Cave

Herzog at Toronto 2010. (Photo by Ebert)

In April at the Conference on World Affairs at the University of Colorado at Boulder, Werner Herzog spoke of the 3D film he was making, “Cave of Forgotten Dreams.”

On the night of 9/13/10, the film had its premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival.

In a conversation that afternoon at TIFF’s Bell Lightbox, Herzog said, “It was only finished yesterday. I haven’t seen it myself.”

Here’s what he said in April about filming it in 3D:

var a2a_config = a2a_config || {};
a2a_config.linkname = “Roger Ebert’s Journal”;
a2a_config.linkurl = “http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/”;
a2a_config.num_services = 8;

April 9, 2013

In memory of the memories of W. G. Sebald

A great man and a haunting and evocative writer died Dec. 14, 2001. W. G. Sebald wrote books like no one else before or after him. His books involve a melancholy prowl through the wreckage of the 20th century and his own sometimes bewildered fragments of memory. They are always described as fiction, yet take the form of memoir and are illustrated by photographs that uncannily and exactly match his words. They are real beyond real. You can do no better than to read him. RE

The entry on Sebald in Wikipedia.

Photographs representing his face, subjects, moods and vision. The Sebald Pool on Flickr.

Analogue.” “Inspired by the writings of W.G. Sebald and Arthur Conan Doyle and the early films of Peter Greenaway, Analogue attempts to re-imagine the sublime in the 19th century romantic landscape.”

“A visual/verbal poem in memory of WG Sebald.”

Sin contra, “without counting”

An architectural history class project in relation to “Topographical Stories” by David Leatherbarrow and “Austerlitz” by WG Sebald.

Amazon.com Widgets

From the Sebald photo pool on Flickr:

April 9, 2013

Aid rushed to movie overdose victims

To play, click on the link
Click here: In Freak Accident, 34 Katherine Heigl Films Released At Once
var a2a_config = a2a_config || {};
a2a_config.linkname = “Roger Ebert’s Journal”;
a2a_config.linkurl = “http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/”;
a2a_config.num_services = 8;

April 9, 2013
subscribe icon

The best movie reviews, in your inbox