In Memoriam 1942 – 2013 “Roger Ebert loved movies.”



The multiple twists, double-crosses and leaps in logic are more likely to prompt giggles than gasps, despite the impressive production values and the earnest efforts…


Oasis: Supersonic

While Oasis: Supersonic is never boring, especially for fans, it’s also not quite deep enough to justify its narrow focus, especially at its overlong running…

Other Reviews
Review Archives

Ballad of Narayama

"The Ballad of Narayama" is a Japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. What a space it opens…

Other Reviews
Great Movie Archives


The Protector 2

The Protector 2 Movie Review

Why, Tony Jaa, why?


If you’re familiar with the work of Tony Jaa, and have followed his career trajectory, you may think you know the reason I’m asking the above question. For those needing to get up to speed: Tony Jaa is a pretty incredible Thai martial arts dude. Not much of an actor, but certainly enough of an incredible Thai martial arts dude to conceive and perform in a series of staggering action sequences in latter-day martial arts classics such as "Ong Bak: Muy Thai Warrior" and its two sequels. He is also known for eschewing what the martial arts movie pros call "wire work" (no flying kicks for him) and reliance on CGI. A good old fashioned organic incredible martial arts dude, in other words.

So Jaa fans may think I’m asking why he’s doing wire work and putting himself in the same frame with CGI effects in his new U.S. release "The Protector 2," but that’s not it. I’m upset because he’s doing such cheesy wire work, and because the CGI effects he’s interacting with are so lame. I’m upset because he’s appearing in a movie that unnecessarily tricks up the admittedly no-big-thing but still amiable character dynamic of the 2005 "The Protector" (Thai country boy makes odd couple with cranky cop) by introducing a villain played by RZA, arguably a hip-hop genius but still The Worst Actor In The World (a title he clinched with 2012’s "The Man With The Iron Fists"). I’m upset because all of the bad acting and bad plotting actually ameliorate the impact of the action scenes. Think about how bad the acting and plotting have to be in order to distill the impact of a Tony Jaa battle scene. If you know a little about Tony Jaa, that’s kind of hard to imagine. I know. But trust me. Or don’t.

The fact is this: if you’re already a Tony Jaa fan, you’re going to see "The Protector 2" anyway. And then you’re likely to say, "Boy, Glenn Kenny was right. Despite the spooky-chick martial arts nieces who go after Tony ‘cause they think he’s killed their gangster uncle, despite the concubine-to-RZA female warrior whose first appearance is in a costume that looks like Mila Jovovich’s getup in "The Fifth Element," despite the truly nifty car chase scene in the first third, despite the AWESOME power of Tony Jaa’s kicks and punches and feints, this is really kind of lousy! I blame RZA." If you’re not a Tony Jaa fan, you should start with "Ong Bak," then see everything else. After which you’ll say, "I wonder if they were right about how lousy 'The Protector 2’ is." And then you’ll find out.


Popular Blog Posts

Who do you read? Good Roger, or Bad Roger?

This message came to me from a reader named Peter Svensland. He and a fr...

No Longer an Inconceivable Future: The Vision of Alfonso Cuarón's "Children of Men"

FFC Seongyong Cho on watching 2006's dystopian thriller "Children of Men" ten years later.

Eye Protein: The Beauty of Trilogía de Guillermo del Toro

A review of Criterion's new box set of Guillermo del Toro films.

Hooray for Hillary: Commander-in-Chief

An article about Hillary Clinton's historic nomination as the first female presidential candidate and the most qualif...

Reveal Comments
comments powered by Disqus