Jane Fonda in Five Acts
Director Susan Lacy has the great advantage of a subject whose life has been extensively documented literally since birth.
"Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan" is a uniter, not a divider. Critics, at least, are strongly united in liking Borat very much (with RottenTomatoes.com ratings in the 90s the week of its release). But those few dissenters who've hated it have hated, hated, HATED it. But do they understand it? Who is the butt of Borat's humor? Is he just a contemptible bigot? A naive ignoramus? A Kazakh Roberto Benigni with a fat moustache? If he's offensive (in a scatological, un-PC, "South Park"-ish way), what exactly is the nature of his offense? Does he undermine stereotypes or just exploit them? Does he offend everyone equally, or is he more discerning about choosing his targets and how he approaches and portrays them? Is he anti-American? Anti-Kazakhstan? Anti-Semitic? Anti-bigotry? Does he get enough potassium? Or does he cramp your style?
My review of "Borat" is here.
Read more, including some hairy naked critical wrasslin' -- and be sure to weigh in with your own impressions (comments, that is) -- here:
Not only would Idris Elba make a great James Bond, the franchise has been building towards casting an actor of color ...
On the new Criterion release of Terrence Malick's The Tree of Life, which includes a new 50-minute-longer extended cu...
A review of the phenomenal new Netflix show starring Jonah Hill and Emma Stone.
This message came to me from a reader named Peter Svensland. He and a fr...