In Memoriam 1942 – 2013 “Roger Ebert loved movies.”

Thumb can forgive

Can You Ever Forgive Me?

Can You Ever Forgive Me? comes from a place of understanding and love that few other biopics do, and it makes this difficult character a…

Thumb halloween poster


Do you know the biggest sin of the new Halloween? It’s just not scary. And that’s one thing you could never say about the original.

Other Reviews
Review Archives
Thumb xbepftvyieurxopaxyzgtgtkwgw

Ballad of Narayama

"The Ballad of Narayama" is a Japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. What a space it opens…

Other Reviews
Great Movie Archives

Movie Answer Man (12/31/1995)

Q. Recently I saw the movie "Heat," and a couple of scenes reminded me of a TV movie I watched a few years ago. When I got home I located the tape and watched it, and it was the same movie! The TV movie was called "L. A. Takedown," and starred one of my favorite TV actors, Alex McArthur. Michael Mann wrote and directed both this movie and "Heat." (D. Jackson, Chicago).

Q. Once again the Golden Globes blew it, by failing to nominate Oliver Stone's brilliant "Nixon" as one of the best-directed films of the year. What gives with this group? (Jordan Marsh, Chicago)


A. Anthony Hopkins was nominated for best actor. But Oliver Stone may have lost the "director" nomination for himself. In behavior that seemed positively Nixonian, he took personal control of the preview press screenings of the movie, insisting on approving every name. In most cities he allowed only a handful of "leading" critics to attend. The Golden Globe membership is made up of Hollywood foreign correspondents--few of them on Stone's A-list. Since 10 actors are nominated (five for comedy, five for drama), enough Globe voters saw the movie to nominate Hopkins. But in the more competitive director category (only five names), Stone's policy may have aced him out a nomination. Ironically, the Globe voters have historically supported Stone; they gave him their "best director" Globe for "JFK."

Q. You go ballistic when a Washington politician chides Hollywood about the garbage it is producing, but are happy to have those Washington politicians dictate what each of the 50 states speed limit laws should be. As a genetically-impaired leftist you are incapable of seeing a paradox there. (Alex R. Thomas, San Antonio, Texas)

A. Actually, I would be against both national speed limits and movie censorship. But my argument was more precise. What I said was that when a popular target (Hollywood) is available, politicians go for votes by attacking it on the grounds that a movie may have inspired a murder. But when the target is unpopular (speed limits), politicians can happily live with thousands of deaths. This, I think you will agree, is hypocrisy. I would also like to query some of Washington's movie critics about their support of tobacco subsidies.

Q. Despite your review saying it was too scary for younger kids, I just took my two children (ages 4 and 7) to "Jumanji," prepared to yank them out of the theater at the first sign of terror. They loved it. The dangerous animals were animated in a somewhat cartoonish style that took out most of the sting. Certainly nothing worse than the scorpion scene in "Honey, I Shrunk the Kids." Comparing this movie to say, "Jurassic Park," (which every kid in America probably owns on video) I'd say it was fairly tame. I really think you were too concerned about the child-in-danger plot. However, certain rules must be followed: Everything must work out okay in the end, nobody dies, and the kids must triumph over the monsters. I'm not claiming this was Great Cinema, and it's not as good as the book, but it hardly qualifies as an evil attempt at terrifying the unsuspecting children of the world. (Leslie Scalfano, Decatur, Ala.)


A. I noticed that a lot of the reviews shared my concern; the movie would have been too intense for me as a kid. But then, I hadn't trained by seeing "Jurassic Park." Thanks for the feedback: All parents should be so observant about what will, and won't, upset their children,

Q. Regarding the mean kid next door in "Toy Story," who takes his toys apart and puts them together in strange ways: It might interest you to know that bashing commercial toys and making new toys out of the pieces is actually a very popular hobby with the kids today. The toy companies don't make action figures for some of the more obscure comics and movie characters, so these people build 'em themselves by cannibalizing the parts they need from existing action figures and then re-painting and in some cases entirely re-sculpting. Many of the results are actually far better than commercial quality. A bunch of comix magazines I read run photos of readers' homemade figures, two or three pages' worth, every month. It's a cool hobby and I wish I had the time to take a crack at it myself. (Andy Ihnatko, Westwood, Mass.)

A. It is so heartening, in this modern age, to learn that kids still make their own toys. Here you go, Junior: Batman, Robin, and a hammer!

Popular Blog Posts

Who do you read? Good Roger, or Bad Roger?

This message came to me from a reader named Peter Svensland. He and a fr...

Netflix’s Terrifying, Moving The Haunting of Hill House is Essential Viewing

A review of Mike Flanagan's new horror series based on the Shirley Jackson novel, The Haunting of Hill House.

Always Leave 'Em Laughing: Peter Bogdanovich on Buster Keaton, superheroes, television, and the effect of time on movies

Peter Bogdanovich, film historian and filmmaker, talks about Buster Keaton, the subject of his new documentary.

Why The Godfather, Part II is the Best of the Trilogy

A look back at one of the best films of all time.

Reveal Comments
comments powered by Disqus