In Memoriam 1942 – 2013 “Roger Ebert loved movies.”

RogerEbert.com

Thumb_ylxcdc106ikiarfthkcacasaacb

La La Land

This is a beautiful film about love and dreams, and how the two impact each other.

Thumb_jackie

Jackie

There are two movies in "Jackie." One of these movies is just OK. The other is exceptional. The first one keeps undermining the second.

Other Reviews
Review Archives
Thumb_xbepftvyieurxopaxyzgtgtkwgw

Ballad of Narayama

"The Ballad of Narayama" is a Japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. What a space it opens…

Other Reviews
Great Movie Archives
Other Articles
Blog Archives
Primary_img_4651_1_

427: Ten years without Jen, twenty-six with

My wife Jennifer died April 27, 2006, at 35, of a heart attack brought on by a defective valve that had somehow escaped doctors’ attention. My daughter was eight years old. My son was two. I was a few months shy of my 38th birthday. It feels like it happened last week, but it also feels like it happened ten years ago. It's never not happening.

This is not another love letter to Jen. I’ve written a lot of those since 2006, the best known of which you can read here. Nor is this a meditation on Jen and the experience of losing Jen by way of criticizing somebody else’s art. Anybody who’s read me for any length of time will tell you that I do that second thing pretty regularly, in the course of reviewing films and TV programs, and of course, when writing obituaries. Sometimes I mention her name, but most of the time she’s an unremarked upon presence binding my words together and keeping the tone on track. She always was my best editor.

No, this is a different piece. It’s about the experience of being without Jen.

It is not an advice piece. I would never offer advice on relationships or matters of the heart. I just feel like it would be as trustworthy as Inspector Clouseau's advice on police work.

It’s a description of where I’ve been, and where I am today.

Every now and then people ask me what the milestones were during the last decade, or what I learned. I have email and phone conversations somewhat regularly with people who know about this part of my biography and are experiencing some version of it now and want to know more or less what they’re in for. I never know what to tell them except that it was all a slow-motion blur, one situation bleeding into another.

Things were especially blurry in the years right after Jen died. I was basically a drunk and a pothead for the first two years, but I was so careful about hiding it that only a few people knew how bad it was. It was so bad that one time I just took off for two weeks and visited three cities, got blackout drunk and woke up in a hotel in a fourth city, San Francisco, in a room overlooking the bay, with no memory of having bought a plane ticket or booked a room there.

Then there was an approximately two-month stretch where I’d leave my kids with friends or family members, get drunk in bars and wander around Brooklyn trying to provoke fistfights with strangers—a suicide wish, to be sure, or maybe just a wish to at least be convicted of assault and go to jail and be taken out of my family’s ongoing story, a drama in which I felt like a miscast actor who couldn’t remember his lines anyway, so what was the point of even being onstage?

I used to castigate myself about all the bad decisions I made during that period.

There were a lot. I mean a lot.

I had two newspaper jobs when Jen died, one full time and the other contract freelance. But I felt embarrassed at my inability to produce at the same level I had before, so I quit both of them. I could have gone on disability from the staff job or taken a sabbatical from the freelance gig. There was no reason to have just quit. It wasn’t helping anyone but the companies that employed me—helping them save a few bucks. Dumb, dumb, dumb. I burned through the insurance money and part of our savings. I sold a share in a condominium in Disney World that Jen had saved up for, to pay for a Super 16mm short film about my mental state about a year-and-a-half into the post-Jen era, a period in which I was drinking several bottles of red wine a day and using sleeping pills and caffeine pills to make myself go to sleep each night and be sure I woke up in time to get my daughter off to school the next day. I think it’s pretty good—at least it looks and sounds good, and has strong performances; I had professonal collaborators—but in a rare burst of common sense, I decided I’d rather spend a few thousand dollars on my children than get it scanned and color-corrected. (The negative is in a plastic bin in a safety deposit box. I have no idea where the sound files are. Somewhere, I hope.)

I used to wish I could blame the profligate spending on a gambling problem, because at least then I could tell people I knew where the money went. A lot of it went to child care and rent and some more to misadventures like the ones listed above. But a lot more money just went poof.

All of this, too, is a blur.

When I entered the dating world (way too soon, in retrospect—with exactly the wrong person for a guy in my situation), I made a mess of things. I made more messes over the years. Big messes. Burning tires/radiation/”This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System” messes.

I used to beat myself up about all the terrible decisions I made—wasting time on relationships that were wrong for me and sabotaging ones that were potentially quite good; pouring time and money into dream projects that were just extensions of therapy rather than work that might realistically pay creative or monetary dividends; making rash decisions about where to work or live.

I don’t beat myself up about much anymore—at least not stuff related to the aftermath of Jen. I did the best that I could under the circumstances. And the mistakes I made are mistakes a lot of people make anyway, even when they aren’t dealing with the loss of a mate.

Things are better now, though. Altogether better. 

I have two jobs again. I’ve written some books that did well. I have great, loyal friends. My brilliant, sardonic daughter is in college now and seems to enjoy it. I have no idea what she’ll end up doing with her life, but I am sure she’ll take it seriously and be great at it. My son is in middle school and has become a decent guitarist and a very good soccer player, and he dotes on his pet guinea pigs and his fish and his cats (I call him Nature Boy). We’re about as well-adjusted as a family can be after what we’ve been through.

I’ve gotten a lot tougher, and I care a bit more about my finances, my credit rating, and stuff like whether or not I will ever own a house—things I never gave a thought to before Jen died because Jen always worried about that stuff (this is the case in a lot of couples, I’ve found, and it’s not always gender-coded; one partner brings in most of the money, the other manages the domestic sphere).

But in other ways I’m the same person, with the same basic flaws and virtues that relatives and old friends remember. I still do impossible things better than most people while screwing up things that any fool ought to be able to do. I still underestimate how much time it takes to do things. I am still scatterbrained, I still forget things, I still procrastinate and get lost in my own head and lose interest in things too quickly. I am still quick to anger, though I like to think I do a better job of managing my temper, and thinking about what I am about to say before I say it, and often deciding not to say anything after all (you might or might not be surprised how often this is the correct strategy). I still don’t take care of myself as well as I should, though at least I go to the gym regularly and favor vegetables and salads and rarely eat fried foods or anything that’s cheesy or greasy. I get somewhat more sleep than I used to. Somewhat. Vampire metabolism runs in my family so there's only so much I can do about that.

But I honestly don’t know if any of that stuff is the result of anything related to losing Jen so much as an inevitable practical response to getting older.

There are some changes that I feel pretty sure are directly related to the loss of Jen.

I listen better to people who are in pain. I don’t judge people as swiftly or harshly as I used to, because I’ve made such a train wreck of so many professional and romantic situations that I know I’m the last person who should be noting other people’s failures. I try to make a point of being kind to people when they’ve royally messed up, and trying to ask what’s going on in their personal lives before offering criticism or a reprimand, because I’ve spent a fair amount of time being called on the carpet for my own mistakes without anybody considering that there were genuine extenuating circumstances, and I know how worthless that can make a person feel.

But here, too, I don’t know how much of that is Jen-related and how much is just getting older and better rather than older and worse. Maybe losing Jen accelerated the process. Or maybe it just caught me up to where people are supposed to be in their forties.

The only thing I can say for sure is that when you give yourself permission to just live—to fall apart when you need to, to feel whatever you’re feeling, to make mistakes and own them, to forgive yourself for what’s recognizably human, to make amends for egregious behavior to the extent that such a thing is possible, to let bad moments and bad days roll off your back instead of masochistically marinating in them—you get through it all with your sanity intact.

This was a very hard lesson to learn.

I’m still learning it.

But that’s a big lesson. It's an umbrella that covers a lot. It boils down to:

Be OK with yourself. Know that you’re handling things as well as they can be handled. Know that you’re not being punished, even though it might feel that way. That you didn’t "deserve" it. You didn’t do anything wrong. Your mate didn’t do anything wrong. It wasn’t the heart attack, the cancer, the diet, the car wreck, the whatever. It was just something that happened.

I’ve never gotten myself into worse trouble, or felt worse about myself, or inflicted more suffering on my family and friends, than when I tried to force life to fit a particular template. I’m a writer by trade, so of course it was inevitable that I’d been thinking about the narrative of my life during the first few years and making decisions that would put a happy ending on my story: Find a mother for these kids, you’ll have a happy ending. Break up with her. Get back together with her. Rinse, repeat. Happy ending. Give up on trying to find a mother for these kids, they don’t need a mother, they already have you. That’ll get you closer to that happy ending. Say yes to this job or no to that other job, happy ending. Take a teaching gig in Long Island. Go back to school and get a degree in counseling and quit journalism and spend time talking to at-risk youth. Happy ending. Move to Dallas. Move to Austin. Move to Los Angeles. Move to Switzerland. And he lived happily ever after. Be a critic. Be a novelist. Be a filmmaker. Move in with your dad and raise your kids from one of his spare bedrooms. Fade to black, roll credits.

Whatever it takes to get to that happy ending.

Whatever it takes.

Well, life is not a story. It’s a series of events that happens to you, and if you’re lucky, that sometimes you make happen. There is not a lot of rhyme or reason in the order. Luck is the residue of design but sometimes it’s just luck. There are symbols everywhere. Life is constantly handing you metaphors. (One breakup occurred during what was supposed to be a romantic overnight stay in a hotel; we had a fight at the bar and on the way back to the room, we found a fork in the middle of the hallway. A fork.) You can rearrange the signs and symbols and events to tell any story you want, but only in retrospect. (You better believe I’ll use that fork someday.)

But what you can’t do is will a happy ending into existence.

If you are trying to do that, it’s probably fated not to happen, because it’s not coming out of the moment you are in and it’s not natural. It’s an attempt to impose control on that which cannot be controlled. 

I keep learning this lesson again and again. The only thing that’s changed in the last decade is the speed with which I catch myself making that same damned fundamental mistake—trying to write the story of my progress through the world—and then pull myself out of it before the damage becomes too great.

Let me give you another example: the observance of April 27.

Friends have said, This must be a hard week for you, or The tenth anniversary must be especially difficult. That’s nice of them. I appreciate it.

But I honestly can’t say that it is that difficult anymore. I’ve stopped trying to control the day, plan the day, force the day to have meaning. And now the day is usually rather pleasant—the kind of low-stress, intimate day that Jen used to enjoy.

This was not always the case.

On April 27, 2007, I sat the office chair in our bedroom at the time that Jen was pronounced dead—6:15 p.m. or thereabouts, according to the coroner; though who could say for sure since, according to a doctor on the scene, she was very likely a goner when they wheeled her into the hospital? I even did a Google search for registered nurse training, which is what was up on the computer screen at the moment of her death. (She wanted to become an emergency room nurse, because she was an unflappable person who thrived during crises; everybody said so.) I was trying to re-create the conditions. I thought maybe a chill wind or some kind of electrical current would pass through me, that I’d feel her spirit flowing through me like The Force and commune with her.

I didn’t. It was just me sitting in a chair with the door closed.

I’d felt odd, even eerie sensations at other times—things that absolutely felt supernatural or uncanny; but never when I expected them, and never when I tried to summon them. I don’t know why I thought this time would be different. I sat there for about twenty more minutes while on the other side of the door, my son James, who was 3, and my daughter Hannah, who was 9, sang Disney karaoke. Finally James knocked on the door and said, “Bare sessities,” which is how he requested “The Bare Necessities” from “The Jungle Book,” and I went out and sang it for them.

I felt grateful and centered after that, but also a bit embarrassed, because obviously singing "The Bare Necessities" with my kids was the best way to commemorate Jen, and how could I not have realized that? I almost missed that moment because I was sitting on the other side of a closed door trying to make something astonishing happen.

I tried to make a practice of not overthinking the anniversary, but it wasn't until the fourth anniversary that I took a major leap forward. The day fell during Ebert Fest. Roger and Chaz had invited me to participate in a panel. I discussed it with my daughter over lunch one Saturday. I said, "I want to go, but I feel guilty not being there with you on the day, and it wouldn't really be appropriate to bring you with me, since it's not the sort of place where I can be with you kids all the time."

She said, "Dad, I understand why you feel that way, but I feel like at some point, it's going to have to be another day. And it might as well be now."

She was 12. And she was right. Her mother would have been proud of her.

Still, I backslide. This year I felt like I should do some special piece, something clever, something with real ambition—a monument to Jen and the art that inspired both of us, or something. The closer I got to the day the more I resisted getting started. A couple of weeks ago, I realized I was doing it again—trying to shape the narrative of my life, and give numbers and calendar pages power over me, instead of just living my life and letting the world speak to me and through me.

Again, as is so often the case, as soon as I let go, things started to happen, seemingly at random—and they all helped me process the loss and feel the weight of the passage of time. The signs were there, the symbols were there. They didn’t “mean” anything in any conventional Fiction 101 sense. They were just there, like shapes in clouds.

At Ebert Fest 2016, I saw two films that felt like commentaries on life without Jen. One was Michael and Mark Polish’s film “Northfork,” a 1950s fantasy-parable about a group of government agents trying to convince homeowners to leave a valley that’s about to be flooded. The other was Brian DePalma’s film “Blow Out,” a thriller about a sound man embroiled in a political conspiracy. “Northfork” is mainly about death and transformation and letting go (there’s even a monologue to that effect at the end) while the climax of “Blow Out” finds the hero rushing across town to try to save his girl and failing (which is kind of what happened to me on April 27, when I got news of Jen’s collapse in Newark and rushed home to be with her in Brooklyn). I was also asked to moderate a panel on “Six Feet Under,” the HBO series about a family of undertakers; specifically, I spoke with Alan Ball while the final episode of the series was screened on a wall behind us, composing a spontaneous commentary track. That episode, as you have probably heard, jumps forward into the future to show the exact circumstances of every character’s death.

All these experiences helped me make sense of the impending anniversary and the time that led to it.

I’m open to all this now. I don’t overthink it like I used to. I accept it emotionally and intellectually but I don’t freight it with more meaning than it can handle. I accept it as part of the natural order of things, more evidence of how your life is always writing itself without your asking it to.

I am in the process of moving into a new apartment. I signed the lease over a month ago. It was only yesterday, as I was carrying a box of books up the front steps, that I realized the address was 427.

I stared at those numbers and laughed. Of course! How odd. How wonderful.

Even more helpful were all the conversations I had with friends and family about Jen, how magnificent Jen was, how much she meant to all of us, and how, all things considered, my kids and I had gotten through the past decade in pretty good shape.

I used to bristle when people said, “Jen would be proud of you,” because all I could think about was the mistakes I’d made, the roads I hadn’t taken, and how inferior I thought I was at parenting compared to Jen, who was casually magnificent at it.

I don’t bristle anymore. I just say “Thank you.”

I’m OK. The kids are OK. I enjoy life. I don't want to die anymore. I want to live.

I think about the future. I think about all the pieces I haven’t written yet. The books I haven’t written yet. The films I might make someday.

I think about the amazing things my kids are going to do one day, and the good people that they already are.

The biggest change of all is this: I’ve quit apologizing for still being madly in love with Jen, casually dropping mentions of her into conversations, quoting her at random.

I used to worry that this kind of thing made people uncomfortable, or that it obligated me to tell the whole epic-tragic back-story, or that it somehow reflected poorly on me in a culture that keeps whispering “move on, move on, move on” into our ears. I don’t concern myself with any of that anymore.

I feel like I don’t have to apologize for that, I don’t have to explain it. It’s part of who I am.

More than that: it’s the thing I’m proudest of.

Jen was the total package. Hardworking, ethical, funny, sexy, a great mother, a great wife, a great friend. The kind of person you wanted in your corner during bad times as well as good. Many men (and a few women) told me later, “You got the girl I always wanted.” This sentiment wasn’t just about her beauty or her laid back charisma. It was a statement about her greatness.

Jen was a great person. And for almost seventeen years, I got to be her partner.

How amazing is that?

Popular Blog Posts

Why Critics Should See Bad Movies

A piece on the experience gained from seeing bad movies.

Who do you read? Good Roger, or Bad Roger?

This message came to me from a reader named Peter Svensland. He and a fr...

The Unloved, Part 36: "Lisztomania"

For the 36th installment in his video essay series about maligned masterworks, Scout Tafoya examines Ken Russell's "L...

Reveal Comments
comments powered by Disqus