In Memoriam 1942 – 2013 “Roger Ebert loved movies.”


The Good Dinosaur

A film that has some promising elements and which often seems as if it is on the verge of evolving into something wonderful but never…


The Danish Girl

The Danish Girl lacks an immediacy and vibrancy, as well as a genuine sense of emotional connection.

Other Reviews
Review Archives

Ballad of Narayama

"The Ballad of Narayama" is a Japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. What a space it opens…


Monsieur Hire

Patrice Leconte's "Monsieur Hire" is a tragedy about loneliness and erotomania, told about two solitary people who have nothing else in common. It involves a…

Other Reviews
Great Movie Archives

'Crash': Overkill filmmaking 101

From: Stephen Moehle, Brea, CA

It seems lately you have devoted a lot of time to defending and proclaiming the virtues of your number one film of the year, "Crash." Most of your focus has been on setting the record straight as to "Crash"'s intentions and portrayal of racism. While your defenses have been spirited they have not converted many "'Crash' Haters" (as they are known across many sites on the internet) to your point of view. Many of our problems with this film go far beyond its parable storytelling and hard to swallow coincidences. It's one thing to disagree with the way a film presents a message, or the message itself, but in "Crash"'s case many of us think it's an example of poor filmmaking at the basic level.

Take one of the most popular scenes in the movie, when the locksmith's daughter is "shot.". Many people have been deeply moved by the scene, others like myself were stunned by how awful the execution was. Here is a scene that could have been played effectively in the hands of an experienced director, but Haggis unfortunately is reading through Filmmaking 101 and throwing every trick up on the screen.

In this single moment there are five techniques used at once; Background blur, slow motion, a slow zoom, muted sound, and "profound" music that plays to let everyone in the audience know that this is an "emotional" scene. One or two of these techniques might have enhanced the scene, but using all at once makes the moment over-the-top, silly, and downright terrible. I can recall numerous films that use these cinematic devices in effective ways: muted sound at the end of "The Godfather, Part III," blurred background in "Blue" to put the focus on the music.

But in "Crash," Haggis has forgotten that old saying that less is sometimes more.
The film is filled with moments like this that show signs of Paul Haggis' directorial inexperience. Instead of a smooth flowing narrative "Crash" is a series of dramatic peaks over and over again, with little time for rising action or quiet moments. I don't need a film about racism to be completely subtle, but making it over-the-top at every turn isn't effective either.

Haggis should have taken some pointers from Eastwood's direction last year in "Million Dollar Baby," a script which he wrote and was subsequently made into a great film. While a better director may not have solved all of the problems "'Crash' Haters" have with the film, it certainly couldn't have made the film any worse.

Popular Blog Posts

Who do you read? Good Roger, or Bad Roger?

This message came to me from a reader named Peter Svensland. He and a fr...

The Unloved, Part 24: "Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows"

The 24th edition of "The Unloved" focuses on the potential of filmmaking within both "Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shad...

Anton Ego and Jesse Eisenberg: some notes on the presumed objectivity of critics

Matt Zoller Seitz reviews and reflects upon Jesse Eisenberg's New Yorker piece about film critics.

Reveal Comments
comments powered by Disqus