In Memoriam 1942 – 2013 “Roger Ebert loved movies.”


The Good Dinosaur

A film that has some promising elements and which often seems as if it is on the verge of evolving into something wonderful but never…


The Danish Girl

The Danish Girl lacks an immediacy and vibrancy, as well as a genuine sense of emotional connection.

Other Reviews
Review Archives

Ballad of Narayama

"The Ballad of Narayama" is a Japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. What a space it opens…


Monsieur Hire

Patrice Leconte's "Monsieur Hire" is a tragedy about loneliness and erotomania, told about two solitary people who have nothing else in common. It involves a…

Other Reviews
Great Movie Archives

Another queasy victim of Shakycam

From Tom Puchniak, Montreal:

Can I suggest you add one more category to film ratings? In addition to things like “language, nudity, violence, sexual situations” etc. it would be a great service to people like me -- who get literally nauseous when watching shaky camera work on a large screen -- if you would include “hand held camera work” or “shaky camera work” in the rating. I have had to walk out of too many films in recent years because the director believes that waving and jerking the camera around constantly gives a sense of immediacy and a documentary feel to a film. Firstly, this is bogus. Most documentary cameramen try to keep the camera steady so the viewer can actually see what is happening on screen. Secondly, the human eye compensates when we run or move around, so that the image does not shake or jiggle. Yet this gimmick is increasingly used by Hollywood film makers and I’ve had to make an early exit to films like “District 9", “The Hurt Locker”, “Once”, and “Syriana”, because of it. Maybe I’m just getting old (I am) but I simply cannot watch films made this way in a cinema with a large screen. And with rare exception, in my opinion it adds nothing to the impact of the film. I would sure like to know if a film features it before buying my ticket.

Popular Blog Posts

Who do you read? Good Roger, or Bad Roger?

This message came to me from a reader named Peter Svensland. He and a fr...

Anton Ego and Jesse Eisenberg: some notes on the presumed objectivity of critics

Matt Zoller Seitz reviews and reflects upon Jesse Eisenberg's New Yorker piece about film critics.

Reveal Comments
comments powered by Disqus