In Memoriam 1942 – 2013 “Roger Ebert loved movies.”

RogerEbert.com

Thumb_8m1wedzu6xjdyqkaiekgeaudjhm

The Water Diviner

Russell Crowe's directorial debut, a drama about a man trying to save three sons who disappeared at the battle of Galliipoli, wants to be a…

Thumb_sv1ouuhxey2lvs23qlpxofcuhv0

The Age of Adaline

Though it's hampered by rather bloodless lead performances, this story of an ageless woman and her two great loves finds its tone in its second…

Other Reviews
Review Archives
Thumb_xbepftvyieurxopaxyzgtgtkwgw

Ballad of Narayama

"The Ballad of Narayama" is a Japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. What a space it opens…

Thumb_jrluxpegcv11ostmz1fqha1bkxq

Monsieur Hire

Patrice Leconte's "Monsieur Hire" is a tragedy about loneliness and erotomania, told about two solitary people who have nothing else in common. It involves a…

Other Reviews
Great Movie Archives

Movie Answer Man (02/11/1996)

Q. I was watching "Judge Dredd" on video, and I noticed something. You know those glare spots on camera shots of cars' headlights, etc., that appear on the screen? Well, film technology technique has managed to almost weed them out entirely. Then I notice that on occasion where a computer generated light source is filmed, those spots are artificially added! That's not the only time I've seen this, either! Why add such a flaw on purpose? (Matt Perry, Rocky Hill, Conn.)

A. The purpose is to make the film look, in a subtle way, more real. Although reflections and highlights are a function of the film itself, we are so used to them that when they're missing we subconsciously register it. In "Toy Story," which was entirely done on computer, one of the brilliant touches was the use of room reflections on the helmet visor of Buzz Lightyear. Check out the trademark logos that studios use at the beginning of films. One of the popular cliches has a wave of light reflecting over the letters, and then a little flashing "ping" of light.

Q. In your movie reviews, you give "Showgirls" and "Sense And Sensibility" the same two-and-a-half stars. Any second thoughts? In your opinion, who is a better writer, Joe Eszterhas or Jane Austen? (John Cauman)

A. Eszterhas is definitely the better screenwriter. The thing about stars is, they're relative, not absolute. I thought "Sense And Sensibility" fell just short of its goal of being more than a respectful adaptation of an official masterpiece, and "Showgirls" fell just short of its goal of being a trashy sexploitation film with style. To see movies that succeed in these two genres, I recommend "Persuasion" and "Beyond the Valley of the Dolls."

Popular Blog Posts

Who do you read? Good Roger, or Bad Roger?

This message came to me from a reader named Peter Svensland. He and a fr...

Showtime’s “Happyish” is a Smug, Self-Righteous Bore

A review of Showtime's Happyish with Steve Coogan, Kathryn Hahn, and Bradley Whitford.

Reveal Comments
comments powered by Disqus