Another queasy victim of Shakycam

From Tom Puchniak, Montreal:

Can I suggest you add one more category to film ratings? In addition to things like “language, nudity, violence, sexual situations” etc. it would be a great service to people like me -- who get literally nauseous when watching shaky camera work on a large screen -- if you would include “hand held camera work” or “shaky camera work” in the rating. I have had to walk out of too many films in recent years because the director believes that waving and jerking the camera around constantly gives a sense of immediacy and a documentary feel to a film. Firstly, this is bogus. Most documentary cameramen try to keep the camera steady so the viewer can actually see what is happening on screen. Secondly, the human eye compensates when we run or move around, so that the image does not shake or jiggle. Yet this gimmick is increasingly used by Hollywood film makers and I’ve had to make an early exit to films like “District 9", “The Hurt Locker”, “Once”, and “Syriana”, because of it. Maybe I’m just getting old (I am) but I simply cannot watch films made this way in a cinema with a large screen. And with rare exception, in my opinion it adds nothing to the impact of the film. I would sure like to know if a film features it before buying my ticket.

Roger Ebert

Roger Ebert was the film critic of the Chicago Sun-Times from 1967 until his death in 2013. In 1975, he won the Pulitzer Prize for distinguished criticism.

Latest blog posts

Latest reviews

Synchronic
Bad Hair
The Queen's Gambit
Coming Home Again
Borat Subsequent Moviefilm

Comments

comments powered by Disqus