Roger Ebert Home


Recent years have not been particularly kind to those hardy souls practicing fine art of journalism. The profession as a whole has been jeopardized by numerous economic factors, along with the rise of new platforms that claim to be legitimate news sources but which focus more on opinion, rumor and innuendo. Journalists now find themselves under increasing attack from the authority figures they cover, who stoke public resentment against them by declaring any critical coverage to be “fake news,” in ways ranging from harassment and detainment to assault and even, as with the infamous case of U.S.-based Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, murder. “Endangered,” the new documentary from the filmmaking team of Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady (whose previous efforts have included “Jesus Camp” and “Norman Lear: Just Another Version of You”), offers viewers an eye-opening and often enraging glimpse at four journalists attempting to do their jobs circa 2020 and the attacks they endure as a result.

After a nostalgic opening montage about how journalism was widely considered to be a respected line of work as recently as the second half of the 20th century, "Endangered" introduces us to its subjects as a way of showing how radically and recently things have changed. In São Paulo, Brazil, reporter Patrícia Campos Mello reports on fraud inside the election campaign of president Jair Bolsonaro. The hardcore nationalist responds to her work by attacking her publicly via crude sexualized comments, which are then spread and amplified by his followers. Mello then makes the risky move of suing him for slander in order to stop them, to hopefully send a message that such acts cannot stand. 

Meanwhile in Mexico City, photojournalist Sashenka Gutierrez covers protests in which women have taken to the street to fight a seemingly constant wave of misogynistic violence. The women find themselves facing off against cops bearing full riot gear and an aggressive attitude that threatens to spill over into brutality at any moment.

Sure, these instances may have occurred outside of America but as the film plainly shows, the sentiment captured in those sequences has become increasingly and depressingly common in these parts as well. In Florida, Miami Herald photographer Carl Juste covers a Black Lives Matter protest following the murder of George Floyd. When the police file false reports regarding their often-violent response to the protesters, his work ends up being used as evidence to disprove them. He's soon followed and harassed by members of the police. Meanwhile, British journalist Oliver Laughland, who follows American politics for The Guardian, covers Trump rallies where his followers have been encouraged to lash out at him and other journalists over so-called “fake news.” When Laughland talks to some of them individually, they inform him that they refuse to buy newspapers that do not reflect their own views and assert that YouTube videos are a much more reliable source of information. It's hardly surprising that the film eventually builds to the events of January 6, and shows the insurrectionists trashing the equipment utilized by reporters to do their jobs.

For those aware of how accusations against the so-called Fourth Estate have been ginned up and fanned by those hoping to disguise their own misdeeds, the film's basic premise—that anti-free press attitudes once solely associated with foreign countries under repressive political regimes are now finding favor in the United States as well—will not come as much of a shock. What is a little startling is how those attitudes are practiced here without the slightest bit of hesitation—in one especially grotesque moment, we see a journalist covering a Black Lives Matter protest lying on the ground and identifying themself as such to a cop, only to get sprayed directly in the eyes. While much within "Endangered" is fairly bleak—and this is not factoring how print journalism is seemingly in a death spiral, especially in regards to all-important local newspapers—there are occasional triumphs as well, such as Mello’s slander suit against Bolsonaro, which ends up having a result she clearly was not expecting.

The only real problem with “Endangered” is that the four stories that Ewing and Grady pursue (not to mention comments from Joel Simon, the then-executive director of the watchdog group Committee to Protect Journalists, who notes the rise in issues against journalists in America in recent years) could have easily been expanded with more detail instead of being consolidated into an 89-minute documentary. However, the filmmakers do an excellent job of intertwining them to the point where the actions in Mexico City and São Paulo are almost interchangeable with what is happening in America. Of course, "Endangered" is unlikely to change the minds of anti-press zealots (not that they'd even be watching it in the first place) but others will hopefully come out of it both shocked and startled to see what is happening to journalists around the world these days. Hopefully viewers will be determined to support their endeavors, perhaps by ordering a subscription to their own local newspapers.

Now playing on HBO Max.

Peter Sobczynski

A moderately insightful critic, full-on Swiftie and all-around bon vivant, Peter Sobczynski, in addition to his work at this site, is also a contributor to The Spool and can be heard weekly discussing new Blu-Ray releases on the Movie Madness podcast on the Now Playing network.

Now playing

Lumberjack the Monster
Taking Venice
I Used to Be Funny
The Beach Boys

Film Credits

Endangered movie poster

Endangered (2022)

90 minutes

Latest blog posts


comments powered by Disqus