"Pandora Just Got a Little Worse for Musicians." By Lydia DePillis for The Washington Post. The American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, which collects and distributes royalties from the outlets that use its 470,000 members' music, just lost a crucial court case with the music streaming service.
"Some of the large labels that license their content through ASCAP tried to withdraw digital music rights from that agreement, and started negotiating higher rates with Pandora on the side. Pandora sued to make sure ASCAP still had to allow access to all the content it had originally, saying its separate agreements only take effect when the ASCAP contract ends, in 2015. On Tuesday, the court came down in Pandora's favor, saying that the terms of the consent decree that governs ASCAP means it can't make exceptions to what it offers."
"U.S. to Include Home Care Aides in Wage and Overtime Law." By Steven Greenhouse for The New York Times. The Obama Administration announced yesterday that, beginning January 1, 2015, all home care aides will be covered under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Related: "In New York, Having a Job, or 2, Doesn't Mean Having a Home." By Mireya Navarro for The New York Times.
"The delay until 2015 is to give families that use these attendants, as well as state Medicaid programs, time to prepare. Industry experts say most of these workers are already paid at least the minimum wage, but many do not receive a time-and-a-half overtime premium when they work more than 40 hours a week. About 20 states exclude home care workers from their wage and hour laws. 'We think the workers providing this critical work should be receiving the same basic protection and coverage as the vast majority of American workers,' said Laura Fortman, deputy administrator of the Labor Department’s Wage and Hour Division. 'We’ve seen a lot of turnover in this industry, and we believe that this new rule will stabilize the work force.'"
"New Jersey's Insane Ban on Self-Serve Gasoline." For Slate, Matthew Yglesias reports on the full extent of said insanity.
"Obviously all else being equal, if you ban self-serve gasoline, you're going to push prices up. New Jersey compensates for this by having an unusually low gasoline tax. That ends up depriving the state government of a source of revenue that scores unusually well on the economic efficiency scale. It's a consumption tax, which economists generally like. But it also penalizes an environmental externality (burning fuel), and since poor people tend not to own cars, it doesn't have the regressive implications of a sales tax. Maryland is being smart and raising its gasoline tax to save for the future by investing in transportation infrastructure. New Jersey, meanwhile, is stuck in a dysfunctional equilibrium of underinvesting in its infrastructure, underpricing gasoline, and annoying everyone with an inefficient gasoline delivery system. The idea, presumably, is that this saves jobs. But you could apply that Luddite logic to anything. New Jersey could ban washing machines to create more employment in the maid sector. Yet nobody does that because it would be insane. And it's not as if "gas station attendant" is such a wonderful job that it makes sense to create an industrial policy strategy around maximizing the number of jobs in that particular field."