In Memoriam 1942 – 2013 “Roger Ebert loved movies.”

RogerEbert.com

Thumb large ouygaatyh4jzithj6fi3uyf31ri

Wonder

You’ll shed a tear or two—especially if you’re a parent—and they’ll be totally earned.

Thumb mv5bztg3yteznjytzty2ns00yjnmltlhnjutzti2m2e5ndi4m2njxkeyxkfqcgdeqxvymzi3mdezmzm . v1 sy1000 cr0 0 675 1000 al

Mudbound

The film invites us to observe its characters, to hear their inner voices, to see what they see and to challenge our own preconceived notions…

Other Reviews
Review Archives
Thumb xbepftvyieurxopaxyzgtgtkwgw

Ballad of Narayama

"The Ballad of Narayama" is a Japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. What a space it opens…

Other Reviews
Great Movie Archives
Other Articles
Chaz's Journal Archives
Other Articles
Channel Archives
Primary blade runner toc 2017

Roger Ebert on "Blade Runner"

With the upcoming release of "Blade Runner 2049," (read Brian Tallerico's review here), we wanted to compile our previous coverage of the Ridley Scott classic, including Roger's reviews of three different versions. 

On June 2, 1982, Roger gave three stars to “Blade Runner.” While praising the special effects more than the character work, Roger wrote that “’Blade Runner’ is worth attending just to witness this artistry.” 

Ten years later, on September 11, 1992, Roger revisited “Blade Runner” through the director’s cut, which Ridley Scott has said was his actual vision for the film. Still, the additions and deletions did not make a significant difference. Roger wrote: Seeing the movie again, even in this revised version, I still felt the human story did not measure up to the special effects.

Advertisement

However, despite the three stars he had awarded to the two versions of “Blade Runner,” in 2007 Roger designated “Blade Runner: The Final Cut” as worthy of Great Movies designation, reviewing the film on November 3, 2007. Along with praising the film among other sci-fi classics such as “Dark City,” “Brazil,” "12 Monkeys" and “Gattaca,” Roger said, “I have never quite embraced ‘Blade Runner,’ admiring it at arm’s length, but now it is time to cave in and admit it to the canon.” 

In 2012, writer Gerardo Valero took a closer look at the visuals of “Blade Runner,” for a piece titled “Blade Runner: Great, but a Little Dull.” 

In 2014, Eric Haywood wrote a piece titled “There’s Something About Blade Runner,” where he enters into the debate that character Rick Deckard is actually the film’s villain.

This week, Brian Tallerico wrote about the Denis Villeneuve-directed sequel, "Blade Runner 2049." Click here to read his three-and-a-half star review

Popular Blog Posts

Why I Stopped Watching Woody Allen Movies

Stop watching movies made by assholes. It'll be OK.

Who do you read? Good Roger, or Bad Roger?

This message came to me from a reader named Peter Svensland. He and a fr...

Tears of a Machine: The Humanity of Luv in "Blade Runner 2049"

No character in “Blade Runner 2049” is more relatably human than Luv.

“Call of Duty” and “Wolfenstein” Redefine the Modern WWII Game

A review of two of the biggest games of 2017, a pair that use World War II in very different ways.

Reveal Comments
comments powered by Disqus