In Memoriam 1942 – 2013 “Roger Ebert loved movies.”

RogerEbert.com

Jexi

Although the title is confounding and perhaps the movie’s worst misstep, it’s Byrne’s digitized and stilted delivery that earns the biggest laughs.

Gemini Man

Lee's recent desire to be at the forefront of frame-based technology, however, is resulting in hollow, empty experiences that are literally hard to watch.

Other reviews
Review Archives

Ballad of Narayama

"The Ballad of Narayama" is a Japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. What a space it opens…

Other reviews
Great Movie Archives

Roger Ebert on "Blade Runner"

With the upcoming release of "Blade Runner 2049," (read Brian Tallerico's review here), we wanted to compile our previous coverage of the Ridley Scott classic, including Roger's reviews of three different versions. 

On June 2, 1982, Roger gave three stars to “Blade Runner.” While praising the special effects more than the character work, Roger wrote that “’Blade Runner’ is worth attending just to witness this artistry.” 

Ten years later, on September 11, 1992, Roger revisited “Blade Runner” through the director’s cut, which Ridley Scott has said was his actual vision for the film. Still, the additions and deletions did not make a significant difference. Roger wrote: Seeing the movie again, even in this revised version, I still felt the human story did not measure up to the special effects.

Advertisement

However, despite the three stars he had awarded to the two versions of “Blade Runner,” in 2007 Roger designated “Blade Runner: The Final Cut” as worthy of Great Movies designation, reviewing the film on November 3, 2007. Along with praising the film among other sci-fi classics such as “Dark City,” “Brazil,” "12 Monkeys" and “Gattaca,” Roger said, “I have never quite embraced ‘Blade Runner,’ admiring it at arm’s length, but now it is time to cave in and admit it to the canon.” 

In 2012, writer Gerardo Valero took a closer look at the visuals of “Blade Runner,” for a piece titled “Blade Runner: Great, but a Little Dull.” 

In 2014, Eric Haywood wrote a piece titled “There’s Something About Blade Runner,” where he enters into the debate that character Rick Deckard is actually the film’s villain.

This week, Brian Tallerico wrote about the Denis Villeneuve-directed sequel, "Blade Runner 2049." Click here to read his three-and-a-half star review

Popular Blog Posts

Robert Forster: 1941-2019

A tribute to Robert Forster.

Who do you read? Good Roger, or Bad Roger?

This message came to me from a reader named Peter Svensland. He and a fr...

Thoughts from Mexico on Rambo: Last Blood

If this movie wasn’t so dumb, I would have probably found all of this offensive.

"The Bed Thing": A Short Film by MZS

A short film about two friends trying to get through a period of loss.

Reveal Comments
comments powered by Disqus