Fast & Furious 6
Squarely state-of-the-art, "Fast 6" is not a great action movie. It has all the ingredients, including a cast that flaunts infectious group chemistry, but its…
Squarely state-of-the-art, "Fast 6" is not a great action movie. It has all the ingredients, including a cast that flaunts infectious group chemistry, but its…
The latest from Blue Sky Studio ("Ice Age," "Rio") is different from whatever Pixar/Disney or any other big animation outfit happens to be offering this…
"The Ballad of Narayama" is a Japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. What a space it opens…
Patrice Leconte's "Monsieur Hire" is a tragedy about loneliness and erotomania, told about two solitary people who have nothing else in common. It involves a…
When Chaz has gone to Cannes without Roger in the past, she has written about the festival in the form of letters and postcards to…
James Gray's "The Immigrant" maintains a tight focus on the Ellis Island experience, and Mohammad Rasoulof's "Manuscripts Don’t Burn" dramatizes the inside of the cruel…
Far Flung Correspondent Seongyong Cho discusses "Kinyarwanda," a powerful look at the genocide in Rwanda.
Roger was a titan in the film community, but he was also a beacon for the seriously disabled.
Far Flung Correspondent Seongyong Cho discusses "Kinyarwanda," a powerful look at the genocide in Rwanda.
Roger was a titan in the film community, but he was also a beacon for the seriously disabled.
The destruction of Vulcan, one of the most crucial planets in the "Star Trek" universe, should be at the core of J.J. Abrams’ "Trek" movies.…
Dear Roger,You emailed me the questions to this interview on March 15, 2013. In your March 16th reply to my email, you said: The piece…
Named after the David Cronenberg film, this is the blog of RogerEbert.com founding editor Jim Emerson, where he has chronicled his enthusiasms and indulged his whims since 2005. Favorite subjects include evidence-based movie criticism, cinematic form and style, comedy, logical reasoning, language, journalism, technology, epistemology and fun. No topic is off-limits, but critical thinking is required.
View image Unimaginable horror.Now this is how to make a list. Richard Corliss writes for Time magazine, a mainstream publication, but that doesn't prevent him from slipping in those inspired, idiosyncratic Corli-cues™ of his. (I just made up that word, and I know it's not a very good one.) Argue all you like with RC's choices (that is the point), this list strikes me as a brilliant balancing of the expected and the unexpected, the mainstream and the marginal, from 1896 to 2004. I think it will thrill you. It might shock you. It may even... horrify you! So if any of you feel that you do not care to subject your nerves to such a strain, now's your chance to, uh, well, we warned you.
So, sure, you see "Red Dragon" (2002) on there and you immediately think, "The Brett Ratner Hannibal Lecter movie? Has he lost his mind?" Then you think, "Well, at least it's better than the Ridley Scott one. Although he also liked that." And then you remember that Corliss never much cared for "Silence of the Lambs" ("a competent but pallid version of Thomas Harris' soul-chilling novel"), so it kind of makes perverse sense.
And then, beyond the solid chunk of essential 1960s and '70s titles (which together account for 11 slots in the reverse-chronological list of 25 -- and that doesn't even include "Don't Look Now," although of course it should), you spot... "Bambi" (1942). Doe! Why didn't I think of that?! Disney's mommy-killing nightmare was surely the most traum-atic horror movie for every generation of children since it was released -- and one that parents still enjoy "sharing with" (or inflicting upon) their kids. (Compare and contrast with the "Baby Mine" scene of the previous year's "Dumbo," an excruciatingly protracted exercise in maternal separation anxiety that is the essence of emotional torture porn.)
The punchline, though, is the last (and oldest) title in the list, by the Lumiere brothers. I'm not going to give it away, but in its day it provided 50 seconds of terror that must have compared with the "Psycho" shower sequence.
(Full list and links after the jump...)
Be sure to read what Corliss has to say about each of his selections. It's fun...
A Scary History Richard Corliss's "Top 25 Horror Movies":(in reverse chronological order)
1. "Shaun of the Dead" (2004) 2. "Red Dragon" (2002) 3. "Audition" (1999) 4. "Braindead / Dead-Alive" (1992) 5. "Men Behind the Sun" (1988) 6. "The Fly" (1986) 7. "Alien" (1979) 8. "Halloween" (1978) 9. "Carrie" (1976) 10. "Jaws" (1975) 11. "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" (1974) 12. "The Exorcist" (1973) 13. "Night of the Living Dead" (1968) 14. "Blood Feast" (1963) 15. "Black Sunday" (1960) 16. "Psycho" (1960) 17. "Peeping Tom" (1960) 18. "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" (1956) 19. "Diabolique" (1955) 20. "Bambi" (1942) 21. "Freaks" (1932) 22. "Frankenstein" (1931) 23. "The Phantom of the Opera" (1925) 24. "Nosferatu" (1922) 25. "Arrival of a Train at La Ciotat" (1896)
Additions? Deletions? Alternatives? Comments?
Next Article: Feliz Dias de los Muertos! Previous Article: Kirk/Spock and Dumbledore
Saturday, May 4, was one month to the day that Roger left this earthly plane. In honor of Kentucky Derby weekend I ...
Today the American Pavilion remembered Roger Ebert with a panel and beachfront thumbs-up salute.
When Chaz has gone to Cannes without Roger in the past, she has written about the festival in the form of letters and...
View image A graffito on Norah Jones. It's confession time again here at Scanners: I've never go...