In Memoriam 1942 – 2013 “Roger Ebert loved movies.”

RogerEbert.com

Thumb_unforgettable

Unforgettable

Slick, glossy and radiating juicy villainy, it knows exactly what kind of movie it is and goes for it with giddy abandon.

Thumb_free_fire_ver12

Free Fire

A "Reservoir Dogs" knockoff 25 years after "Reservoir Dogs."

Other Reviews
Review Archives
Thumb_xbepftvyieurxopaxyzgtgtkwgw

Ballad of Narayama

"The Ballad of Narayama" is a Japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. What a space it opens…

Other Reviews
Great Movie Archives

What's wrong with "To Kill a Mockingbird"?

From Mary McReynolds, Arcadia, OK:

What a sad commentary on Ebert's belief system that he would slam a classic film based on a classic novel, neither of which would probably even be published or filmed today, given our politically correct biases. "To Kill a Mockingbird" is not about black people rising up in anger against injustice. That wasn't the book's intent, nor was it the film's intent. It was about Harper Lee's sublime vision and reporting of an era when good people were good, black or white, and bad people were bad of whatever stripe. There comes a time in every critic's life when he gets so full of himself that his reviews are all about him and his precious prejudices, truth be damned.

Shame on Roger Ebert.

I make my own decisions anyway on what constitutes great film.

Advertisement

Popular Blog Posts

Who do you read? Good Roger, or Bad Roger?

This message came to me from a reader named Peter Svensland. He and a fr...

Pure, Unadulterated Fun: "Mystery Science Theater 3000" is Revived on Netflix

A review of the "Mystery Science Theater 3000" revival that's now playing on Netflix.

Reveal Comments
comments powered by Disqus