In Memoriam 1942 – 2013 “Roger Ebert loved movies.”

RogerEbert.com

Thumb_wieziu4bw15rhb3nt58mcbpgv3r

When Marnie Was There

It is filled with the luscious, beautiful 2D animation that we’ve come to expect from Ghibli, and if the storytelling sometimes gets a bit lethargic…

Thumb_jrz5dbcqdqtrdfxq1yhmdcqy6yd

Sunshine Superman

I found Jean Boenish’s philosophical musings less than persuasive. And I don’t think my fear of heights was the reason for my bias.

Other Reviews
Review Archives
Thumb_xbepftvyieurxopaxyzgtgtkwgw

Ballad of Narayama

"The Ballad of Narayama" is a Japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. What a space it opens…

Thumb_jrluxpegcv11ostmz1fqha1bkxq

Monsieur Hire

Patrice Leconte's "Monsieur Hire" is a tragedy about loneliness and erotomania, told about two solitary people who have nothing else in common. It involves a…

Other Reviews
Great Movie Archives
Other Articles
Cannes Archives
Other Articles
Far Flunger Archives

Gay-baiting Cruise for cheap laughs?

From: Alan Wootson

You had an interesting piece on the "South Park"-Tom Cruise controversy but I think you missed an important aspect of the 'controversal' episode, and "South Park" in general. I've seen the episode in question, and as the title suggests, a big part of the story involves different characters repeating over and over that Tom Cruise needs to "come out of the closet.' The Cruise character on the show literally locks himself in a closet but this is clearly just an opportunity for the "South Park" creators to gay-bash (or gay-bait) Cruise, and yet again attempt to get cheap laughs with homophobic humor.

Perhaps it was being labelled as gay in this manor that Cruise objected to even more than any attacks on Scientology.

Was he right if he did indeed put pressure on Paramount to pull the episode? I wouldn't say that, but think it's understandable. Why should he cooperate with a corporation that's insulting him, anymore than he has to?

For the record I'm not a Scientologist, I'm not gay and I'm not really much of a Cruise fan (though I thought he was good in "Rain Man" and "War of the Worlds"). Whenever Cruise/Homles celeb hype comes on TV I change the channel and I'm going to skip "Mission Impossible: 3" the way I skipped the first two.

I watched "South Park" when it first came on for a season or two, before it occured to me that the creators really play the 'both sides againt the middle' game in their satire. It makes sense for ratings. You can make some statements against racism or intollerance based on religion or sexual orientation, but also work in the gay jokes and Jewish jokes and sexist jokes to hold onto the 'red state' portion of your audience.

In the end, of course all that really means is that while you appear to be speaking out on important issues, you really aren't saying and don't stand for anything.

Popular Blog Posts

Bill Murray, iPhones and Our One-Handed Species

An essay on how technology has rendered us a one-handed species.

Who do you read? Good Roger, or Bad Roger?

This message came to me from a reader named Peter Svensland. He and a fr...

Video games can never be art

Having once made the statement above, I have declined all opportunities to ...

My problem with "Blue Velvet"

If you want to understand David Lynch, maybe the place to start is with his paintings. He paints in a style he descri...

Reveal Comments
comments powered by Disqus