In Memoriam 1942 – 2013 “Roger Ebert loved movies.”

RogerEbert.com

Thumb_pride_ver2

Pride

Takes a formulaic approach but is ultimately very effective in its retelling of the fundraising activities of Lesbians and Gays Support the Miners. Would make…

Thumb_boxtrolls_ver13

The Boxtrolls

"The Boxtrolls" is a beautiful example of the potential in LAIKA's stop-motion approach, and the images onscreen are tactile and layered. But, as always, it's…

Other Reviews
Review Archives
Thumb_xbepftvyieurxopaxyzgtgtkwgw

Ballad of Narayama

"The Ballad of Narayama" is a Japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. What a space it opens…

Thumb_jrluxpegcv11ostmz1fqha1bkxq

Monsieur Hire

Patrice Leconte's "Monsieur Hire" is a tragedy about loneliness and erotomania, told about two solitary people who have nothing else in common. It involves a…

Other Reviews
Great Movie Archives

Didn't like film, keeps open mind, isn't an idiot

From Richard R. Warner of Tillamook, Oregon

I like alien invasion movies. I like Aaron Eckhart. I grew up in Los Angeles, and I like watching movies filmed there with locations recognizable from my childhood.

I will be going to see this movie this weekend. I imagine it will probably only be marginally better than Skyline, which had a few good moments but by and large was a steaming pile. I will pay my ten bucks, settle in with my beverage and my nachos, and turn off my brain. I may think it sucks, and even if I enjoy it my memory of the film will probably evaporate in the sunshine before I get to my car. But here's a philosophical question for you...if I never were to actually see the film, but would have "admired" it if I had, am I still an idiot?

I am a funeral director and embalmer and I go to the movies for many reasons - to be inspired, to cry, to gaze in wide wonder at the impossible beauty of Emily Blunt, to escape. Mostly to escape, as I get older and the weight of the reality that is my career bears down on my optimism and unfettered enjoyment of simple pleasures. When I go to see a film like "No Country for Old Men" or the latest from Mike Leigh, I have different expectations and watch the movie differently than something like this film, or "The Run Down," or hell, I don't know, "Mamma Mia!" It seems to me that denigrating someone for taking pleasure in whatever it was onscreen that brought them out of the world for two hours (although you hedged your bets a little by using the word admire) is a bit like calling someone shallow based solely on one or two records in their collection that don't meet your own standards of artistic excellence.

Ebert: I wrote Mr. Warner asking, "So...how did you like it?" He wrote back:

"I thought it was more than a bit crap.MTV-style technique was apparently implemented to make up for any number of other cinematic elements, although oddly enough I thought the second act was the strongest. The problem with most of these 'worldwide alien invasion seen through the eyes of a small group of plucky humans' films is that at the point when the valiant citizens of earth stumble upon the aliens' weakness, I would have to think the invading horde would just cut bait, take the (literal) nuclear option, and bugger off home. Hard to see it as anything other than a distracting bit of propaganda, but it was a not-entirely unenjoyable diversion, and Aaron Eckhart gave all."

Popular Blog Posts

Who do you read? Good Roger, or Bad Roger?

This message came to me from a reader named Peter Svensland. He and a fr...

Why my video essay about "All that Jazz" is not on the Criterion blu-ray

Bob Fosse's masterpiece "All That Jazz" jumps back and forth through the past and the present, and through memory and...

The Unloved, Part Ten: "The Village"

Part ten in Scout Tafoya's The Unloved series tackles "The Village."

Ebert's Most Hated

EDITOR'S NOTE: Sometimes, Roger Ebert is exposed to bad movies. When that happens, it is his duty -- if not necessari...

Reveal Comments
comments powered by Disqus