In Memoriam 1942 – 2013 “Roger Ebert loved movies.”

RogerEbert.com

Thumb_mv5bmjm3ndcxotm5ml5bml5banbnxkftztgwntewnze0mze_._v1__sx1216_sy712_

Mortdecai

Not only is it a one-joke characterization, the joke is on the level of a below-average knock-knock joke.

Thumb_mv5bmtg4mjuxodczm15bml5banbnxkftztgwmdy4mjy0mze_._v1__sx1216_sy712_

Son of a Gun

Avery’s more than capable behind the camera, he just needs to be met halfway by his screenwriting, which dwells in overly familiar territory.

Other Reviews
Review Archives
Thumb_xbepftvyieurxopaxyzgtgtkwgw

Ballad of Narayama

"The Ballad of Narayama" is a Japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. What a space it opens…

Thumb_jrluxpegcv11ostmz1fqha1bkxq

Monsieur Hire

Patrice Leconte's "Monsieur Hire" is a tragedy about loneliness and erotomania, told about two solitary people who have nothing else in common. It involves a…

Other Reviews
Great Movie Archives

'Crash': Glorified student film?

From: Gary G. DeAtley, Danville, CA

I truly am puzzled by your praise for "Crash" though I have no doubt that it is sincere and well-reasoned. Although I am a life-long movie fan, I admit that "Crash" went totally under my radar during its theatrical release. My son, a USC alumnus, came to visit one weekend and he brought a copy of "Crash." About forty minutes in, I turned to him and said something like "How in the world did one of your film student friends get all of these major Hollywood types to be in his film?" (I know, I know, that must come across as so very goofy on my part but that is what happened.) "Dad", he said, "this is Paul Haggis, he wrote it , directed it and, I think, produced it". I was literally dumfounded.

My initial remark stemmed from my reaction to the manner in which the film was treating the subject matter. It seemed so over the top "sincere" in an immature, sophomoric way. I watched the rest of film and simply did not know what to think. A joke? Satire? Why did Mr. Haggis feel it was necessary to grab me by the shoulders and scream for ninety or so minutes: "Racism! My God! It's all so COMPLEX!!!"; and "LOOK!, LOOK!, THE IRONY!" The entire experience was akin to reading an email typed in all caps.

As far as "Brokeback Mountain" is concerned, all explanations for its loss are going to be anecdotal. Certainly, homophobia played some role with certain Academy voters. More than likely,however, it comes down to the fact that "Crash" was made by a large group of very popular people and friends voted for their friends.

"Brokeback" was marketed as a "gay love story" (which to some sounded sort of pornographic) rather than a film concerning the universal tragedy of intolerance. The artistry employed to tell the story was subtle, beautiful, totally cinematic and ultimately exquisite. I think it will stand the test of time. I do not think "Crash" will. Just hope we are both around to see!

Popular Blog Posts

Confessions of an Awards Season Skeptic, Part Two: I, A Lone Voice of Sanity and Calm Awash in a Sea of Noise and Indignation

Glenn Kenny tries to provide some calm, reason, and perspective to today's major Oscar nominations.

Who do you read? Good Roger, or Bad Roger?

This message came to me from a reader named Peter Svensland. He and a fr...

They're All Gonna Laugh At You: The "Carrie" Remake

A look at Kimberly Pierce's 2013 version of "Carrie."

The 87th Academy Award Nominations and Fun Facts

The official nominees along with some fun facts about this year's crop.

Reveal Comments
comments powered by Disqus