In Memoriam 1942 – 2013 “Roger Ebert loved movies.”

RogerEbert.com

Thumb_poltergeist

Poltergeist

Rarely has a remake felt more contractually obligated than the 2015 version of Poltergeist.

Thumb_jrz5dbcqdqtrdfxq1yhmdcqy6yd

Sunshine Superman

I found Jean Boenish’s philosophical musings less than persuasive. And I don’t think my fear of heights was the reason for my bias.

Other Reviews
Review Archives
Thumb_xbepftvyieurxopaxyzgtgtkwgw

Ballad of Narayama

"The Ballad of Narayama" is a Japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. What a space it opens…

Thumb_jrluxpegcv11ostmz1fqha1bkxq

Monsieur Hire

Patrice Leconte's "Monsieur Hire" is a tragedy about loneliness and erotomania, told about two solitary people who have nothing else in common. It involves a…

Other Reviews
Great Movie Archives
Other Articles
Cannes Archives
Other Articles
Far Flunger Archives
Other Articles
Channel Archives

'Crash': Glorified student film?

From: Gary G. DeAtley, Danville, CA

I truly am puzzled by your praise for "Crash" though I have no doubt that it is sincere and well-reasoned. Although I am a life-long movie fan, I admit that "Crash" went totally under my radar during its theatrical release. My son, a USC alumnus, came to visit one weekend and he brought a copy of "Crash." About forty minutes in, I turned to him and said something like "How in the world did one of your film student friends get all of these major Hollywood types to be in his film?" (I know, I know, that must come across as so very goofy on my part but that is what happened.) "Dad", he said, "this is Paul Haggis, he wrote it , directed it and, I think, produced it". I was literally dumfounded.

My initial remark stemmed from my reaction to the manner in which the film was treating the subject matter. It seemed so over the top "sincere" in an immature, sophomoric way. I watched the rest of film and simply did not know what to think. A joke? Satire? Why did Mr. Haggis feel it was necessary to grab me by the shoulders and scream for ninety or so minutes: "Racism! My God! It's all so COMPLEX!!!"; and "LOOK!, LOOK!, THE IRONY!" The entire experience was akin to reading an email typed in all caps.

As far as "Brokeback Mountain" is concerned, all explanations for its loss are going to be anecdotal. Certainly, homophobia played some role with certain Academy voters. More than likely,however, it comes down to the fact that "Crash" was made by a large group of very popular people and friends voted for their friends.

"Brokeback" was marketed as a "gay love story" (which to some sounded sort of pornographic) rather than a film concerning the universal tragedy of intolerance. The artistry employed to tell the story was subtle, beautiful, totally cinematic and ultimately exquisite. I think it will stand the test of time. I do not think "Crash" will. Just hope we are both around to see!

Popular Blog Posts

Who do you read? Good Roger, or Bad Roger?

This message came to me from a reader named Peter Svensland. He and a fr...

Video games can never be art

Having once made the statement above, I have declined all opportunities to ...

Bill Murray, iPhones and Our One-Handed Species

An essay on how technology has rendered us a one-handed species.

"2001" -- The Monolith and the Message

Good parables explain themselves. After you have read the story of Lazarus in the Bible, you don't need anyone to exp...

Reveal Comments
comments powered by Disqus