In Memoriam 1942 – 2013 “Roger Ebert loved movies.”

RogerEbert.com

Thumb_split_ver3

Split

It’s exciting to see Shyamalan on such confident footing once more, all these years later.

Other Reviews
Review Archives
Thumb_xbepftvyieurxopaxyzgtgtkwgw

Ballad of Narayama

"The Ballad of Narayama" is a Japanese film of great beauty and elegant artifice, telling a story of startling cruelty. What a space it opens…

Other Reviews
Great Movie Archives
Other Articles
Festivals & Awards Archives
Other Articles
Blog Archives
Other Articles
Channel Archives
Primary_hr_birdman_16

If We Picked the Winners 2015: Best Actor

In anticipation of the Academy Awards, we polled our contributors to see who they thought should win the Oscar. Once we had our winners, we asked various writers to make the case for our selection in each category. Here, Glenn Kenny makes the case for the Best Actor of 2014: Michael Keaton in "Birdman". Two winners will be announced Monday through Thursday, ending in our choices for Best Picture and Best Director on Friday.


Because almost every actor in Alejandro G. Iñarritu’s “Birdman” is playing an actor, critics have easily yielded to the temptation to conclude that the leads, particularly the male leads Michael Keaton and Edward Norton, are playing some versions of themselves. In Keaton’s case, a correspondence seems particularly direct: he plays Riggan Thompson, a movie star whose fame and now-apparently-dwindling fortune was made playing a movie superhero, the titular “Birdman.” Thompson is, in the movie, going for a shot at artistic redemption by sinking what’s left of his rep, and a good deal of his money, into a cockamamie Broadway project, adapting a famed Raymond Carver book for the stage. The tortured Thompson seems to be trying to make amends for participating in what Norton’s more “pure” co-star Mike calls “cultural genocide.” But even as Thompson tries to make good, his gruff, break-stuff superhero alter-ego dogs his every step.

Keaton’s performance, unspooling in the hard-earned illusion of a single-take shot, is a marvel of wit, anger, self-effacement, and a whole lot more. But here’s an interesting thing, and the reason they call it, you know, “acting:” Keaton is NOT playing himself. (And neither is Norton, but this piece isn’t about him.) As he’s made pretty clear doing the press for “Birdman,” Keaton’s not hungry for redemption; he wears his “Batman” past pretty lightly; he picks his roles according to his interests, not in search of a self-re-invention milestone. His work as Riggan is more a feat of empathy and craft than of ostensible self-revelation, despite the scene in which Riggan is compelled to walk through Times Square in nothing but underwear briefs and socks. And he’s also funny as hell, which is often how we like Michael Keaton. 

Popular Blog Posts

Who do you read? Good Roger, or Bad Roger?

This message came to me from a reader named Peter Svensland. He and a fr...

Films to Get Us Through The Trump Presidency

Chaz Ebert highlights films with the potential to get us through the confusing political times of the Trump presidenc...

Netflix's "A Series of Unfortunate Events" an Unfunny Parody of Sadness

A review of Netflix's new series, Lemony Snicket's "A Series of Unfortunate Events," which premieres January 13.

The Audacious "Something Wild" Comes to Criterion Blu-ray

One of the most audacious American films from the 1960s is now available via the Criterion Collection.

Reveal Comments
comments powered by Disqus